ABSTRACT
Abstract Assessment of the Nutritional Status (NS) allows screening for malnutrition and obesity, conditions associated with chronic non-communicable diseases. The fat mass index (FMI) stands out concerning traditional NS indicators. However, proposals that define thresholds for FMI are not sensitive to discriminate extreme cases (degrees of obesity or thinness). Only one proposal (NHANES), determined by total body densitometry (DXA), established eight categories of NS classification (FMI). However, DXA is expensive and not always clinically available. Our study aims to test the validity of the NHANES method using electrical bioimpedance (BIA) and skinfold thickness (ST) to classify NS. The FMI of 135 (69 women) university students aged 18 to 30 years old was determined using DXA, BIA, and ST. The agreement between the instruments (Bland-Altman) and the agreement coefficient in the NS classifications (Chi-square and Kappa index) were tested. The agreement test against DXA indicated that ST underestimated the FMI (-1.9 kg/m2) for both sexes and BIA in women (-2.0 kg/m2). However, BIA overestimated FMI (1.4 kg/m2) in men, although with less bias. There was no agreement between the NS classifications (NHANES) by FMI between DXA and BIA, or DXA and ST. The exception occurred between DXA and BIA in men who showed a slightly better consensus, considered "fair" (k = 0.214; p = 0.001). In conclusion, ST and BIA did not show enough agreement to replace DXA for NS classification, within NHANES thresholds. The FMI measurement tools for the NHANES classification of the categories of NS matters.
Resumo Avaliar o Estado Nutricional (EN) permite rastrear desnutrição e obesidade, condições associadas a doenças crônicas não transmissíveis. O índice de massa gorda (IMG) destaca-se em relação aos indicadores tradicionais de EN. No entanto, propostas que definem limiares para IMG não são sensíveis para discriminar casos extremos (graus de obesidade ou magreza). Apenas uma proposta (NHANES) estabeleceu oito categorias de classificação EN (IMG), mas foi determinada por densitometria corporal total (DXA). Porém, DXA é caro e nem sempre disponível. O objetivo foi testar a validade do método NHANES usando bioimpedância elétrica (BIA) e dobras cutâneas (DOCs) para classificar o EN. O IMG de 135 (69 mulheres) universitários com idade entre 18 e 30 anos foi obtido por DXA, BIA e DOCs. A concordância foi testada entre os instrumentos (Bland-Altman) e classificações de EN (Qui quadrado e índice Kappa). O teste de concordância com a DXA indicou as DOCs subestimarem o IMG (-1,9 kg/m2) para ambos os sexos e a BIA em mulheres (-2,0 kg/m2). No entanto, as BIA superestimaram o IMG (1,4 kg/m2) nos homens, embora com menos viés. Não houve concordância entre as classificações de EN (NHANES) pelo IMG entre DXA e BIA/DOCs. A exceção ocorreu entre DXA e BIA em homens que apresentaram concordância "razoável" (k = 0,214; p = 0,001). Em conclusão, DOCs e BIA não mostraram concordância suficiente para substituir DXA pela classificação de EN, dentro dos limites NHANES. As ferramentas diferem para medir IMG e classificar categorias de EN (NHANES).
ABSTRACT
Abstract Aim: to estimate the resting energy expenditure (REE) of organ tissue components using Dual Energy x-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in pubertal boys. The mass of components and REE were compared among groups of different nutritional statuses. Methods: a sample of 278 boys (13.7 ± 2.4 years old) was grouped according to BMI nutritional status for Brazilian children and adolescents1 such as Underweight (UW), Normal weight (NW), Overweight (OW), and Obese (OB). The REE of organ tissue components given by DXA was calculated using specific models for skeletal muscle tissue (SMT), adipose tissue (AT), bone tissue (BT) and residual tissue (RT) based on previous reports. The absolute and relative REE (REEDXA) of each component were statistically compared among groups. Results: No differences of total REEDXA were found among nutritional groups (F(3, 274)=0.071, p=0.976). When, however, specific REE was considered per component, differences were found for BT and REEBT between NW-OW (p=0.003) and NW-OB (p=0.048); in AT and REEAT for all the groups (p<0.001), except between UW-NW (p=1.000); in RT and REERT between NW-OB (p=0,022) and SMT and REESMT (p=0,039). Greater proportions of organ tissue of RT and high metabolic rates, were observed in the UW group (78.3%) in comparison to the OB group (60.7%). Conclusion: This approach provides a new opportunity to examine energy metabolism for individual differences of pediatric populations. It is an applicable strategy both to prescribe exercises and to administer diets to this population, as it reveals the magnitude of heat-producing body components.